Skip to content
Buyersagents.com.au
How many investment properties should you own? It's the wrong question

How many investment properties should you own? It's the wrong question

21 Sept 2026
3 min read
220 views

Why someone else's pace isn't your benchmark

Ask an investor how many properties they own and most will answer with pride. Ask them how comfortably they are holding those properties and the room goes quiet.

As a buyers agent working across multiple markets, I see this pattern constantly. Property count has become a proxy for success. A portfolio of six sounds more impressive than a portfolio of two, regardless of what either one is actually costing the person who owns it.

The belief is not irrational. Bigger portfolios generally mean more equity, more optionality, more long-term growth exposure. What gets left out of that framing is the cost side.

The cost side of the conversation nobody has

Entry-level investment grade property costs materially more today than it did a decade ago, in most capital city and growth regional markets. A bigger purchase price means a bigger loan, bigger repayments, and less margin if income or rates move against you. Buying has become the easy part to talk about. Holding has not kept pace in the conversation.

The question that matters is not how many properties you can buy. It is how many you can buy well, hold comfortably, and still live your life while they compound.

Buying to your holding capacity, not your borrowing capacity

Run the numbers far enough forward and the case for restraint gets stronger, not weaker. Take a portfolio in the low millions, add nothing further, and put everything toward clearing debt instead.

Modelled conservatively over roughly two decades, that path alone can produce a meaningful passive income in today's dollar value, assuming stable rates and income. No further purchases required.

That outcome depends entirely on your own numbers, and working out what it looks like for you is a conversation for your accountant or financial adviser, not a newsletter.

The trade-off sits underneath this regardless of the exact figures. Chasing more properties faster usually means less buffer and less flexibility. Buying to your holding capacity instead of your borrowing capacity usually means slower headline growth and a lower risk of being forced to sell at the wrong time.

Why someone else's pace isn't your benchmark

Someone else's capacity to keep buying is not a benchmark. A person with a mature portfolio, low personal commitments, and years of accumulated equity is in a different position to someone on their first or second purchase. Watching them add another property says nothing about whether the same move is right for you right now.

Before your next purchase, decide what you are actually optimising for. Property count, or a portfolio you can hold without your life shrinking around it. Then run your own numbers with a licensed adviser before you commit to either.

If you want a structured framework for making your next property decision, the free 10-day email series covers each decision in order.
www.thenelisgroup.com.au/insights

Disclaimer: The information in this article is general in nature and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is not financial, legal, or tax advice. The Nelis Group accepts no liability for actions taken based on this content. You should seek independent advice from a relevant licensed professional before making any decisions and always confirm the latest rules and thresholds with your state revenue office or relevant authority.